Considering user needs

I think it’s better to ask the user what they specifically need, such as organizing key points, timelines, impact analysis, or comparisons with other stadiums. The guidelines suggest reacting quickly while seeking clarification. I want to mention potential implications of a renovation, like seating and the possibility of hosting a professional football team. However, I need to be cautious about details regarding the teams in Wuhan since their status has been uncertain recently. It might be good to ask if they want me to look up more information.Formulating a response

I want to acknowledge the big news about WISC being rebuilt into an 80,000-seat, football-specific stadium. I should ask if the user wants a quick brief that includes key facts, expected timelines, or possible impacts like events and club tenancy. I could also discuss challenges such as costs and FIFA standards. I can offer to draft an FAQ or a news brief while keeping it concise. I might add some context about the original Wuhan Sports Center, which was multi-purpose, but I'll be cautious not to provide too many details in case I get something wrong.

好消息！如果已官宣将把武汉体育中心改建为8万座的专业足球场，这对武汉的职业赛事与大型活动承载力是一次量级提升。

你希望我怎么帮你整理？

1. 快速要点版：容量、定位、预计时间表、改造范围（跑道/看台/屋顶/草皮）、合规标准（FIFA/亚足联）。
2. 深度影响分析：对主客队入驻、票房与商业、申办大型赛事的可能性、交通与片区更新、运营模式与风险。
3. 对比参考：与国内/亚洲同量级球场容量与配置对比，座位覆盖率、看台坡度、视线、混合草等指标科普。
4. 资讯汇总：官方来源链接＋主流媒体报道时间线（需要我现查资料的话可以帮你抓要点）。

也可以直接告诉我：你更关心时间表、设计亮点、资金与运营、还是未来能承办哪些赛事。